In the rich history of the game of chess, games have been
won in many curious & devious ways but to win a game without touching a single
piece is taking it bit too far.
But there is a way, albeit using a slight technicality in chess terms. In chess terminology, a pawn is
technically not a ‘piece’. Bishops & Knights are minor pieces. Queens &
Rooks are major pieces. But pawns are.... just pawns.
But has there ever been a game when a player won by exclusively moving his pawns?
1. d4 d5
2. c4 e6
3. Nc3 c5
4. Bf4 cxd4
5. Bxb8?
White overlooks what follows.
5. … dxc3
6. Be5 cxb2
White resigned. He must lose at least a rook in view of the
threat of Bb4+
REPLAY THE MOVES
Quarter of a century later, same fate befell upon another
unsuspecting player whose miserable attempt at following the best traditions of
the hypermodern chess school resulted in losing a knight after 7 moves.
Borochow - Fine (1932)
1. e4 Nf6
2. e5 Nd5
3. c4 Nb6
4. d4 Nc6
5. d5 Nxe5
6. c5 Nbc4
7. f4
Black resigned as losing a piece is unavoidable. (7. … e6 is met with 8. Qd4).
REPLAY THE MOVES
0 comments: